[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Octave check warning
From: |
Simon Albrecht |
Subject: |
Octave check warning |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Nov 2017 00:14:54 +0100 |
Hello,
here’s a kind of pet peeve of mine: With a warning like
warning: octave check failed; expected "a", found: "a,"
I always have to look twice what the difference between the two is. It
might be easier to read as
warning: octave check failed; expected "a" and found "a,"
(or: ‘but found’)
– would you agree?
Best,
Simon
- Octave check warning,
Simon Albrecht <=