[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20? |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Dec 2017 14:33:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Joram <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi David,
>
>> The same as before, except that I am a whole lot more pissed.
>
> I am sorry. I leave this discussion. It does not lead anywhere.
That's what I told everybody repeatedly, but it takes hours for every
single one to take notice.
Of course that holds up review work more. And it doesn't help that I
had to spend a few hours today turning old wooden pallets into firewood
(and it doesn't improve my mood that I currently have quite the tennis
elbow from lugging them on the circular saw) because the importance of a
timely stable release is not high enough for LilyPond users that I could
afford central heating.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, Étienne Beaulé, 2017/12/01
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, David Kastrup, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, Joram, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, David Kastrup, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, Joram, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, David Kastrup, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, Joram, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, David Kastrup, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, Joram, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, Tomohiro Tatejima, 2017/12/02
- Re: -dcrop not included in 2.20?, David Kastrup, 2017/12/02