[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Limiting the number of accepted contexts
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Limiting the number of accepted contexts |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jul 2018 18:38:56 -0400 |
On Jul 12, 2018, at 09:32, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> Karlin High <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 7/12/2018 8:21 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> What is this good for?
>>
>> Maybe what's mentioned in the last paragraph of the original post,
>> "eliminate a small amount of special code for Global/Score.”
>
> By replacing it with a larger amount of special code not good for
> anything else but hiding its purpose?
>
>> If otherwise, it might need clarification from the OP.
>
> That would seem like a good idea.
Preparing code for review, I was adding comments explaining special handling
for the relationship between the Global context and the Score context, and they
started sounding rather like an apology; so I thought that maybe I should try
to improve the situation.
However, if nobody sees any significant value in having the context definition
reflect the actual behavior in this respect, I’ll just polish my comments and
stop worrying about it.
Regards,
—
Dan