[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jul 2018 23:29:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just noticed that it’s possible to use the LilyPond symbol list/key
> list syntax when setting melismaBusyProperties. However, the doc
> string reads
>
> "A list of properties (symbols) to determine whether a melisma is playing.
> Setting this property will influence how lyrics are aligned to notes.
> For example, if set to @code{'(melismaBusy beamMelismaBusy)},
> only manual melismata and manual beams are considered.
> Possible values include @code{melismaBusy}, @code{slurMelismaBusy},
> @code{tieMelismaBusy}, and @code{beamMelismaBusy}."
>
> Would we want to change the first code example to
>
> @code{melismaBusy,beamMelismaBusy}
>
> or otherwise suggest the new syntax?
Feel free to do so, I think. It's not really a change of syntax
specifically for melismaBusyProperties so I'd likely not mess with the
descriptions when they talk about "symbol list" or whatever. Instead
I'd just change the examples.
--
David Kastrup
- melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Simon Albrecht, 2018/07/15
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Carl Sorensen, 2018/07/15
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Simon Albrecht, 2018/07/15
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Carl Sorensen, 2018/07/15
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Thomas Morley, 2018/07/16
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, David Kastrup, 2018/07/16
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, Thomas Morley, 2018/07/16
- Re: melismaBusyProperties: scheme syntax vs. lily syntax, David Kastrup, 2018/07/16