Re: compilation with clang

[Werner LEMBERG]

>> No.  It's not C++08 syntax, and LilyPond actually makes use of the
>> overloading resolution (which of the templates is called depends on
>> where in the hierarchy the function that the function pointer
>> refers to is defined) as part of the macro framework used here and
>> thus it's not possible to manually resolve the override and kill
>> all the prospective alternatives.
> 
> Besides, the way I read the "work-around" output, it still fails in
> Clang.

It seems that the code adds a second solution; you get an error for
the first one but the second succeeds (i.e., doesn't produce an error
on clang).


    Werner