Re: Please test gub

[Knut Petersen]

On 31.01.19 15:43, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> Addendum:
>
> On 31.01.19 15:39, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> > Whenever I can, I "correct" shebangs to python2 (without ever having looked up 
> > this PEP), and nobody ever complained that it breaks their workflow.
>
> That is to say: I've yet to encounter a system where python points to python2.x, but at the 
> same time there's no python2 -> python2.x symlink/hardlink/anylink/copy/wrapper. So I 
> doubt that adding the "2" will cause any grief.
There are not too many files with a python  shebang ...

   LANG=c grep -r '^#!' * | grep -v '^Binary file' | grep -v uploads/ | grep -v 
downloads/ | grep -v target | grep -i python
   bin/cygwin-packager:#! /usr/bin/env python
   bin/gub-tester:#! /usr/bin/env python
   bin/build-architecture:#! /usr/bin/env python
   bin/build-platform:#! /usr/bin/env python
   bin/gib:#! /usr/bin/env python
   bin/gupdate:#! /usr/bin/env python
   bin/gub:#! /usr/bin/env python
   bin/gpkg:#! /usr/bin/env python
   gub/runner.py:#! /usr/bin/env python
   gub/distcc.py:#!/usr/bin/env python
   gub/with-lock.py:#!/usr/bin/env python
   gub/versiondb.py:#!/usr/bin/env python
   sourcefiles/pytt.py:#! @PYTHON@
   sourcefiles/python-config.py:#! @PYTHON_FOR_BUILD@
   test-lily/rsync-lily-doc.py:#! /usr/bin/env python
   test-lily/test-binary.py:#! /usr/bin/env python
   test-lily/rsync-test.py:#! /usr/bin/env python
   test-lily/upload.py:#! /usr/bin/env python
   test-lily/dist-check.py:#! /usr/bin/env python
   test-lily/cron-builder.py:#! /usr/bin/env python

Do you want to prepare a patch?

Knut