Re: add fermata markup commands (issue 344160043 by address@hidden)

[lilypond]

On 2019/02/28 09:41:26, lemzwerg wrote:
> [Oops, pressed the wrong button]

> The idea of

>    \fermata 'foo

> is its open endedness; you don't have to define a new command for a
new fermata
> type.  I'm a fan of a smaller set of multiplex commands instead of a
larger set
> of specific macros (which a user could always define by herself).
However, this
> is probably just me.

Hm … Would this apply to the already existing script commands
\shortfermata etc.? Then we would need a convert-ly rule.

And maybe we should take that opportunity to add a very short fermata
and the Henze variants to comply SMuFL:
https://w3c.github.io/smufl/gitbook/tables/holds-and-pauses.html

https://codereview.appspot.com/344160043/