Re: 64-bit version of Lilypond?

[Jacques Menu]

> Le 8 mars 2019 à 19:14, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> a écrit :
> 
> 
>> On 8 Mar 2019, at 15:42, Karlin High <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> On 3/8/2019 8:31 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>>> So, my vote would be to try to do a Darwin-only version of Lilypond, and 
>>> position Frescobaldi as the "default editor" for Mac users.
>> 
>> Would MacPorts installation be adequate for LilyPond? Hans Åberg reports 
>> success with this. Or is it important to have something available from 
>> lilypond.org?
> 
> I would be good if more people try the MacPorts installation.
> 
> The lilypond-devel version lists gcc8 as a library dependency, so that speaks 
> for it, rather than trying to use XCode clang, which is not the real one, but 
> an Apple inhouse version of unknown relation to the real one, and I recall 
> you had some problems with getting it to compile with clang. The one you use 
> now I think is gcc4.2, which is the last real gcc that Apple had, in later 
> versions, this name defaults to clang.
> 
> I think too that it might be better to switch to say Frescobaldi as the 
> official LilyPond editor if you need one, though I haven't used it. Their 
> site is only in Dutch from what I could see, which might be a turnoff.
> 

The English version link at the bottom left leads to a 404.

JM