[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden)
From: |
nine . fierce . ballads |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Feb 2020 09:04:10 -0800 |
On 2020/02/01 15:04:41, trueroad wrote:
> In `-std=c++11`, most POSIX functions/definitions cannot be used.
> Also `putenv ()` and `chroot ()` cannot be used.
But is it the case that the implementations of those functions requires
GNU C++ extensions, or is it the case that their header files are not
explicitly included where they need to be?
https://codereview.appspot.com/579270051/
- Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), trueroad, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), trueroad, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden),
nine . fierce . ballads <=
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), trueroad, 2020/02/01
- Re: Issue 5720: Fix C++11 option (issue 579270051 by address@hidden), lemzwerg, 2020/02/02