Re: Document 2 functions in markup-macros.scm (issue 581570043 by address@hidden)

[hanwenn]

On 2020/02/01 22:35:38, lemzwerg wrote:
> > you need to read the comment at the top of the file too..
> 
> Well, ...
> 
> > I think this function should not have been pulbic,
> > and suspect it is only so some of the macros can work.
> 
> ... even a non-public function should have an understandable doc
string, so
> thanks for the fix!

you're welcome. Did you mean to see LGTM?

https://codereview.appspot.com/581570043/