[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit |
|
Date: |
Fri, 07 Feb 2020 16:16:17 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:36 PM David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > n the spirit for providing competing options, I hereby offer a Gerrit
>> > RFC. Note that I'm an obvious fan of Gerrit, but Gitlab seems an
>> > acceptable solution to me too.
>> >
>> >
>> > [RFC] Gerrit for LilyPond
>>
>> If I understand correctly, it would replace the Rietveld part of our
>> workflow, but not the SourceForge part.
>>
>
> Not quite.
>
> You can track the status of patches within gerrit, by means of label votes.
> So there is no need to use sourceforge for tracking patch statuses.
Issues do track more than patch status.
--
David Kastrup