Re: RFC: docker for CI

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 11:31 PM Janek Warchoł <address@hidden>
wrote:

> In principle, thumbs up. However, I think it's essential that we don't try
> to do too much at once; I'd suggest to focus on one most important aspect
> first. To do that, I'd like to ask a helper question: what are 2 most
> important reasons for using Docker instead of Patchy? In other words, what
> are 2 things that we want to be able to do which are impossible/difficult
> with Patchy? (your proposal tells about the "what?" and the "how?", I'd
> like to know the "why?")
>
>
Docker provides a very simple mechanism to assure reproducible test runs.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen