lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patchy email


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Patchy email
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 00:53:50 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

address@hidden writes:

> 23:08:39 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at     
> 825dd87d0b1b58e56d7c66ef1fc1dd672d913c84
> 23:08:41 Auto packing the repository in background for optimum performance.
> See "git help gc" for manual housekeeping.
> 23:08:47 Merged staging, now at:      825dd87d0b1b58e56d7c66ef1fc1dd672d913c84
> 23:08:48      Success:                ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
> 23:09:00      Success:                /tmp/lilypond-autobuild/configure 
> --enable-checking
> 23:09:02      Success:                nice make clean
> 23:12:38      Success:                nice make -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
> 23:17:06      Success:                nice make test -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
> 23:31:48 *** FAILED BUILD ***
>       nice make doc -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
>       Previous good commit:   06b5ac8389b5cc3c9afbb2c84e2e5c02d0c9dca0
>       Current broken commit:  825dd87d0b1b58e56d7c66ef1fc1dd672d913c84
> 23:31:48 *** FAILED STEP ***
>       merge from staging
>       Failed runner: nice make doc -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
> See the log file log-staging-nice-make-doc--j9-CPU_COUNT=9.txt
> 23:31:48 Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File 
> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
> line 528, in handle_staging
>     self.build (issue_id=issue_id)
>   File 
> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
> line 333, in build
>     issue_id)
>   File 
> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py", 
> line 266, in runner
>     raise FailedCommand ("Failed runner: %s\nSee the log file %s" % (command, 
> this_logfilename))
> FailedCommand: Failed runner: nice make doc -j9 CPU_COUNT=9
> See the log file log-staging-nice-make-doc--j9-CPU_COUNT=9.txt

That one was actually a segfault.  Cannot plausibly come from my patch,
so that is sort-of confusing.  I'll retry.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]