[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tidy check on Ubuntu Xenial
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Tidy check on Ubuntu Xenial |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Mar 2020 18:58:45 +0100 |
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 6:00 PM Dan Eble <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mar 15, 2020, at 10:26, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 2:33 AM Dan Eble <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mar 14, 2020, at 19:39, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 9:16 PM Dan Eble <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>> I assume the warnings are incorrect, otherwise you would be asking for
> >>>> help to fix them rather than asking whether checking the HTML is
> >>>> valuable. Is that assumption correct?
> >>>
> >>> The version on Xenial generates these warnings, while the version on
> >>> Fedora doesn't, which is pretty confusing.
> >>
> >> Certainly, but the question is whether they are legitimate.
> >
> > Nobody has complained about HTML compliance of the regtests, so I
> > think this is fine either way.
>
> Another dodge.
I tried fixing it; Jonas commented that I was replacing the new
recommended way with the deprecated one.
See https://codereview.appspot.com/563730043/#msg2
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Re: Tidy check on Ubuntu Xenial, pkx166h, 2020/03/14