[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 5862: Prefer astyle 3.1 and update clang-format options (issue
|
From: |
nine . fierce . ballads |
|
Subject: |
Re: Issue 5862: Prefer astyle 3.1 and update clang-format options (issue 551640043 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:17:17 -0700 |
On 2020/03/26 11:35:11, dak wrote:
> On 2020/03/26 01:25:57, Dan Eble wrote:
> > It's worth emphasizing this: even with these improvements to the
clang-format
> > configuration, those who use clang-format will introduce a truckload
of
> > differences from the traditional indentation.
...
> correctly. Is there some reasonable hope that we could boil down a
"common
> denominator" style where alternately applying clang formatting and
fixcc would
> end up with a fixed end result rather than some cycle?
I have not familiarized myself with the options of astyle, but at
present, I'm not optimistic.
Still, as I worked on this change, I noticed a couple of common and
simple things that could take another bite out of the differences:
1. space or no space after the "operator" keyword
2. space or no space after "template" in "template<class T>"
https://codereview.appspot.com/551640043/