[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@h
From: |
jonas . hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sat, 02 May 2020 03:09:33 -0700 |
On 2020/05/02 10:04:14, dak wrote:
> On 2020/05/02 09:49:44, hahnjo wrote:
> > On 2020/05/01 06:28:56, hanwenn wrote:
> > > I suggest we make this an option that you have enable explicitly.
> >
> > done
> >
> > > If it is enabled, we'd have to change the --license output to say
AGPL as
> > well.
> >
> > I thought about this and decided against it:
> > 1. LilyPond stays under GPL, even if the whole may be AGPL.
> > 2. I don't see a good option to find out the license of the library
we link
> to.
> > 3. It's not our business of giving legal advice. Instead I added a
warning to
> > the configure option "Beware of licensing implications!"
>
> If it is a compile time option that actually links stuff (and the
headers
> suggest that), we should add something like
>
> This version of LilyPond has been compiled and linked with a version
> of Ghostscript licensed under the AGPL.
Please re-read point 2 above. Old Ghostscript versions are not AGPL and
other implementations may not be either.
https://codereview.appspot.com/548030043/
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), (continued)
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden),
jonas . hahnfeld <=
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/03