[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements
From: |
Paolo Prete |
Subject: |
Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements) |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jun 2020 16:10:47 +0200 |
On Thursday, June 25, 2020, Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:
> Le 25/06/2020 à 00:58, Paolo Prete a écrit :
>
> Hi Harm,
>
> Then Pierre, who is the creator of the snippet and joined this thread, will
> decide what to do.
>
> Best,
> P
>
> Hi Paolo,
>
> I still highly encourage you to fill an issue at
> https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues
>
> Judging from piano-pedal-engraver.cc, the main authors of the code
> used for piano pedals are Jan, Erik Sandberg and Chris Jackson. None
> of them is currently active on LilyPond as far as I know. It certainly
> isn't a blocker, but the issue isn't trivial either as you mentioned.
> Mailing list threads are volatile: people who are currently on holiday, or
> busy, or who will join development in months or years won't read them.
> This is why an issue is the way to go. I didn't open one because I thought
> you'd want to do it, but someone else can go ahead if you prefer.
>
> Cheers,
> Jean
>
>
Hi Jean,
Given that
1) fixing this issue requires a not trivial change and the authours of the
code are no longer active
2) this issue, as the replies of this thread show, is not considered a
major one (as I instead do; and I'm still convinced that a pedal Bracket
without a cautionary text is unusable / unpresentable) but it appears more
or less as an "enhancement"
If you sum 1 + 2 chances that the reported issue will be developed are ~ 0.
So, in order to produce a concrete result, at least the point 2) should be
accepted / understood. This is what I tried to do, but the thread seems to
go in the opposite way. This is why I think that opening a ticket would be
unuseful for now and I did not open it. But if you think it could be
useful, be free (of course) to open it ...
Best,
P
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), (continued)
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Paolo Prete, 2020/06/23
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Carl Sorensen, 2020/06/23
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Jean Abou Samra, 2020/06/23
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Paolo Prete, 2020/06/23
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Carl Sorensen, 2020/06/23
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Paolo Prete, 2020/06/23
Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Thomas Morley, 2020/06/24
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Paolo Prete, 2020/06/24
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Jean Abou Samra, 2020/06/25
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements),
Paolo Prete <=
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Jean Abou Samra, 2020/06/25
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Paolo Prete, 2020/06/25
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Valentin Villenave, 2020/06/26
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Paolo Prete, 2020/06/26
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), David Rogers, 2020/06/26
- Re: Pedal cautionary after a line break (current status and improvements), Paolo Prete, 2020/06/26