[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Run formatting tools
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: Run formatting tools |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:35:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.36.5 |
Am Freitag, den 25.09.2020, 09:31 +0200 schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
> > What puzzles me a bit is the magnitude of changes from autopep8 - I
> > thought this tool was run in August? Maybe I'm missing something;
> > FWIW I used the invocation "autopep8 -ia --ignore=E402" as
> > documented in CG.
> >
> > Thoughts, objections? Should I exclude running autopep8?
>
> I was told from a Python professional developer that the best tool for
> formatting python code be `black`. Running
>
> black -l 78 ...
>
> gives indeed very nice formatting (not tested with lilypond stuff,
> though).
Hm, I thought we agreed on using autopep8 more than two months ago? I'm
not very familiar with either tool but I'm against switching back and
forth multiple times, that'll just cause churn in the code.
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Run formatting tools, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/25
- Re: Run formatting tools, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/25
- Re: Run formatting tools,
Jonas Hahnfeld <=
- Re: Run formatting tools, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2020/09/25
- Re: Run formatting tools, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/25
- Re: Run formatting tools, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/25
- Re: Run formatting tools, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/25
- Re: Run formatting tools, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/25
- Re: Run formatting tools, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/25
- Re: Run formatting tools, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/09/26
- Re: Run formatting tools, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/27