[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tie over clef change
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: tie over clef change |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Sep 2020 12:04:50 -0400 |
> On Sep 26, 2020, at 09:41, Dan Eble <dan@faithful.be> wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2020, at 08:55, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Despite Gould's “incorrect” verdict, here is an example from an old UE
>> edition of Liszt's “Liebestraum No. 1”, which demonstrates that ties
>> over clef changes *do* happen and make sense sometimes...
>>
>> I still think that LilyPond should support that, handling the tie like
>> a slur in this case.
>
> That's a very good example. It's hard to imagine any reasonable alternative.
>
> What kind of grob would an editor expect here? a Tie because it connects
> notes of the same pitch, or a Slur because it connects notes at different
> staff positions? (or something else?)
I'll answer my own question. A tie from d♯ to e♭ generates a Tie grob, so for
consistency, this should be a Tie that looks like a slur.
—
Dan
- tie over clef change, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change,
Dan Eble <=
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Dan Eble, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, David Kastrup, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Jean Abou Samra, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, David Kastrup, 2020/09/27
- Re: tie over clef change, Werner LEMBERG, 2020/09/26
- Re: tie over clef change, Hans Åberg, 2020/09/26