[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regtest not catched by make check
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: regtest not catched by make check |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:30:36 +0100 |
Am Sa., 7. Nov. 2020 um 15:35 Uhr schrieb Michael Käppler <xmichael-k@web.de>:
>
> Am 07.11.2020 um 13:23 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it would be nice to have a regression test for
> > https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/497
> >
> > I think I found some way to display differently with and without the
> > fix. See the attached file.
> >
> > Though, I can't convince 'make check' to catch the difference.
> Hi Harm,
> could you please try to run
> `lilypond -ddump-signatures' on your regtest, with and without the fix
> and compare
> the .signature files?
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
> >
> > Currently I'm at a loss. Any hints?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harm
>
Hi Michael,
I followed your advice and applied a diff between the two .signature-files.
With no output. They are equal...
Though, the pdf's aren't. See attached.
Obviously I don't understand what 'make chack' is looking for...
Thanks,
Harm
fret-diagrams-dot-color-fixed.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
fret-diagrams-dot-color-without-fix.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
- regtest not catched by make check, Thomas Morley, 2020/11/07
- Re: regtest not catched by make check, Michael Käppler, 2020/11/07
- Re: regtest not catched by make check,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: regtest not catched by make check, Thomas Morley, 2020/11/07
- Re: regtest not catched by make check, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/11/08
- Re: regtest not catched by make check, Thomas Morley, 2020/11/08
- Re: regtest not catched by make check, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/11/08
- Re: regtest not catched by make check, Thomas Morley, 2020/11/08