Re: \segno is an articulation?

[Dan Eble]

On Feb 27, 2021, at 06:44, James Lowe <pkx166h@posteo.net> wrote:
> 
> convert-ly considerations aside (and really trying not to bike-shed), would 
> it be simpler using this example, if we did away with /segno and instead of 
> re-purposing created explicit commands (e.g. /segnoSign, /segnoSection, 
> /segnoWhatever etc.) so that there was never any confusion moving forward?
> 
> re-purposing is never pretty (people forget or unexpected things break) and 
> at least everyone would know which /segno command did what.

Thanks for the input, friends.  I'm never quick to call "bikeshedding," but I 
know some people are.  You've given me some ideas to work with.
— 
Dan