[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6 |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:10:17 +0100 |
Am Fr., 12. März 2021 um 10:45 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
<thomasmorley65@gmail.com>:
>
> Am Do., 11. März 2021 um 22:47 Uhr schrieb Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
> > Do you already have results?
>
> Currently my regular job eats up all my time.
> Probably I'll find some free time at upcoming weekend, not sure though...
> If so, to which guile-version should I compare, guile-1.8 (which is
> still LilyPond-default) or a certain guile-2/3-version?
Found some time today...
I tested a huge ly-score, once sent by Jean-Charles for testing
different guile-versions:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2016-11/msg00948.html
Thanks again!
I made it compilable with recent ly-master out of
55ca32d951dd17556df8d0332b861f0cd189379a
(though I didn't fix all warnings and programming errors)
Tested with these guile versions:
guile-1.8.8 from tarball
guile-2-2-6 out of a69b567d97f7c9193924c775e1dd86e43a35b8bd
guile-3.0.6 from master, i.e. out of 85433fc2b122dc78342c3c83941949d1d9318399
(although (version) says: 3.0.5.116-85433)
There are some guile-warnings, multiple instances of:
WARNING: (#{ g478}#): `smallCaps-markup' imported from both (lily) and
(#{ g171}#)
WARNING: (scm framework-ps): imported module (lily) overrides core binding `_'
The latter one is about gettext and PITA.
I compiled Urtext.ly from the tarball linked above (giving a 158 pages pdf):
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
guile-1.8.8
real 4m37,304s
user 4m14,144s
sys 0m7,717s
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
guile-2.2.6, (version) says: 2.2.6.7-9a11b
real 7m18,995s
user 6m41,808s
sys 0m11,960s
eating much more memory than guile-1.8.8
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
guile-3.0.6, (version) says: 3.0.5.116-85433
real 5m49,587s
user 5m11,033s
sys 0m9,488s
eating a little more memory than with guile-1.8.8 but far less than guile-2.2.6
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Interestingly I found some older timing values from former tests:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
released lilypond-2.19.52 with guile-1.8.7
real 8m16.191s
user 6m39.864s
sys 0m10.860s
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
with guile-versions from 2.0.14 and 2.1.7 I noted:
Best result was:
real 25m17.082s
user 31m1.668s
sys 0m5.480s
Worst result was:
real 77m44.348s
user 100m40.324s
sys 0m18.932s
Though, my noted former results are a little messy: I can't say
anymore which guile-version with which lilypond-patches was
best/worst.
Anyway, both, LilyPond and guile seem to have improved a lot.
Cheers,
Harm
- Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2021/03/10
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Thomas Morley, 2021/03/10
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Federico Bruni, 2021/03/10
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Thomas Morley, 2021/03/10
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/03/10
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2021/03/11
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Thomas Morley, 2021/03/12
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2021/03/18
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Thomas Morley, 2021/03/18
Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2021/03/12
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2021/03/12
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2021/03/12
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, David Kastrup, 2021/03/12
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2021/03/13
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/03/17
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide, 2021/03/17
- Re: Test reader speed of Guile 3.0.6, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/03/18