Re: footnote marks not included in skylines

[Jean Abou Samra]

Le 27/04/2021 à 10:57, David Kastrup a écrit :
> Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> writes:
>
> > Le 27/04/2021 à 07:28, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> >
> > > Right now, the NR section on footnotes looks very ugly.  Reason is
> > > that footnote marks are not included in skylines; as a consequence,
> > > they are cut off, see attached images.  (BTW, it seems that this fact
> > > is not mentioned in the documentation.)
> > >
> > > Do you have suggestions how the samples in the NR can be improved to
> > > avoid this cut-off?
> >
> > Hi Werner,
> >
> > I think this is more-or-less expected: we don't want footnotes to
> > influence the spacing of the music in general, especially horizontal
> > spacing.  As to vertical spacing, I don't really know. Maybe they
> > ought to be part of the system's skylines, but should we let them
> > reserve space between systems?
> >
> > Cross-staff objects suffer from a similar problem:
> >
> > <<
> >    \new Staff = "up" { s4 }
> >    \new Staff = "down" {
> >      \stemUp
> >      \override Beam.positions = #'(17 . 17)
> >      a16 b
> >      \change Staff = "up"
> >      c' d'
> >    }
> "Cross-staff" means "reserve no skyline".


Yes, and "don't take in account in axis group extents".

> It should really be more
> specific, like "no skyline between systems x and y" because the _outer_
> skylines should still be affected.

I absolutely agree.

> Not sure how this related to
> footnote numbers.

I got in a muddle.  Forget about it, sorry.