[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PoC] EXPERIMENTAL binaries of LilyPond 2.22.1
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: [PoC] EXPERIMENTAL binaries of LilyPond 2.22.1 |
Date: |
Sun, 16 May 2021 14:40:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.40.1 |
Am Sonntag, dem 16.05.2021 um 13:58 +0200 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> many thanks for your hard work!
>
> I'm testing with Linux 64-bit after having done GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=1
> One thing I stumpled across by accident was:
>
> \version "2.22.1"
>
> \relative c'' {
> bes4^"ऌ"
> }
>
> With this example it's a lot, up to 25%, slower than with vanilla lilypond.
Not sure if I understand you: Is Guile 2.2 25% slower than LilyPond
with Guile 1.8 or the other way around? On my system, I see 0.7 seconds
for Guile 1.8 and 0.6 seconds with Guile 2.2 (after compiling the
bytecode). Keep in mind that the times are very short, so the results
might vary a lot from run to run...
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [PoC] EXPERIMENTAL binaries of LilyPond 2.22.1, (continued)
Re: [PoC] EXPERIMENTAL binaries of LilyPond 2.22.1, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/05/16
Re: [PoC] EXPERIMENTAL binaries of LilyPond 2.22.1, Carl Sorensen, 2021/05/15
Re: [PoC] EXPERIMENTAL binaries of LilyPond 2.22.1, Thomas Morley, 2021/05/16
Re: [PoC] EXPERIMENTAL binaries of LilyPond 2.22.1, Federico Bruni, 2021/05/19