|
From: | Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: | Re: Please review Pygments lexer and style |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:36:43 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
Le 23/06/2021 à 19:03, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
Le 23/06/2021 à 18:53, Dan Eble a écrit :Not a bad idea, but -1 for the use of light colors on white: silver, yellow, sky blue, etc.What is the minimum set of distinctions that is likely to do more good than harm? The example is a little overwhelming.(All MHO.)I should probably find something else for pitches and durations. The example does look overwhelming, but it was intentionally constructed as a showcase for many pieces of syntax and builtins. A typical score mostly consists of long runs of pitches and durations interspersed with articulations and commands, so I think making many distinctions should be fine as long as the most common parts of the syntax have colors that are easy enough to read.
Here is a new "patch set". - New colors for pitches, articulations and some others. - Darker colors overall.- No distinction between dynamics and other articulations, nor between \header and \paper variables, nor music functions and music shortcuts.
How does this look? I've been staring at it for too long to even see if it's acceptable.
Thanks, Jean
example.html
Description: Text document
example.rtf
Description: RTF file
MSDM_Credo.rtf
Description: RTF file
MSDM_Credo.html
Description: Text document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |