[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:56:01 +0100 |
> Le 23 nov. 2021 à 10:22, Phil Holmes <mail@philholmes.net> a écrit :
>
>> On 22/11/2021 19:07, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
>>> Le 22/11/2021 à 20:05, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
>>> Note that I don't intend to make it a public
>>> lilypond-book option for users, simply because it
>>> would require adding Pygments in the build process,
>>> which may be complicated (I don't know) and is in
>>> my opinion unnecessary.
>>
>> Sorry, the meaning of this sentence got lost in
>> a rephrasing: I meant the build process to create
>> the official binaries (GUB or Jonas' new system).
> I don't think we should be considering having a system where document builds
> in GUB are different from document builds in the normal development
> environment, for 2 reasons. 1) It could easily lead to difficult to debug
> problems with GUB (which is difficult as it is) and 2) it would make checking
> the docs before an "official" build impossible.
The more I look at it, the more I lean towards including Pygments in our source
tree (as an archive to keep diffs readable; Python has the convenient ability
to import modules from ZIP archives). However, if it's a configure flag in the
end, it will definitely be exercised in the GitLab CI (and by anyone who wants
to develop with it switched on).
Jean
Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2021/11/22
- Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/11/22
- Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond, James, 2021/11/22
- Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/11/22
- Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/11/22
- Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond, Phil Holmes, 2021/11/23
- Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond,
Jean Abou Samra <=
Re: ANN: Pygments support for LilyPond, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/11/22