Re: Binaries of LilyPond 2.23.5 with Guile 2.2

[Jonas Hahnfeld]

Am Donnerstag, dem 09.12.2021 um 06:32 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> 
> On Wed, Dec 8 2021 at 21:25:47 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de> 
> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 01:43 +0100 schrieb Federico Bruni:
> > >  I know you want to build natively and you don't have an ARM64 
> > > machine to build it.
> > >  Any chance you can use for example Github runners to build them?
> > > 
> > > https://github.community/t/ask-about-github-hosted-runners-arm64-platform-support/167483
> > >  
> > > https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners/about-self-hosted-runners#supported-architectures-and-operating-systems-for-self-hosted-runners
> > 
> > As discussed in that thread, there are no AArch64 runners available on
> > GitHub, we'd have to provide them ourselves AFAICS. I'm not sure this
> > makes sense... How do you provide AArch64 binaries right now? If this
> > is an extension, I'd like to postpone this until we're actually on 
> > this new infrastructure.
> 
> LilyPond is built from source on Flathub infrastructure.
> If you click on the green check here:
> https://github.com/flathub/org.frescobaldi.Frescobaldi/commits/master
> 
> you'll see the recent builds. This is for aarch64:
> https://flathub.org/builds/#/builders/51/builds/5253
> 
> Yes, it's not Github.

Ok, so it could stay like this, there's nothing that would be "broken"
by not providing AArch64 binaries.
Btw, is there a reason the Flatpak only bundles 2.22.0, not the latest
2.22.1?

Jonas

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part