Re: procedure to check equality of list-elements

[Luca Fascione]

Note the detail that + a b c and eq? a b c don't do the exact same thing:

+ a b c is equivalent to (a + b) + c
eq? a b c is equivalent to (a == b) && (b == c)

The list form has short circuiting if I remember right (eq? bails out on
the first false it finds), but I don't remember how evaluation works for
the arguments, in terms of what side effects are meant to observable when
early-out happens

L


>