[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation
From: |
Luca Fascione |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2022 16:34:22 +0100 |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 2:05 PM Jean Abou Samra <jean@abou-samra.fr> wrote:
> > Le 21 nov. 2022 à 13:46, Luca Fascione <l.fascione@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > Sorry, luatex is like 10yrs old, what's the need for xetex again?
> Are you asking this to me (judging from To:/Cc:)? I don’t see one.
>
No, I was asking the group in general.
Editing emails on my phone is... obnoxious.
> > Maybe I could justify pdftex (I really don't quite see it, but maybe)
> As said on the MR, it is faster and makes for lighter CI Docker images.
>
Oh luatex is definitely slower, but still, is it slower enough that it
makes a real difference?
I'd imagine for package maintainer folks and developers it's no matter, it
might slow down doc folks if the build the
tex stuff a lot, but I'd like to hear from them anyways before jumping to
that conclusion.
--
Luca Fascione
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, (continued)
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, David Kastrup, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/22
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21