[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pygment regex question,Re: pygment regex question
From: |
Luca Fascione |
Subject: |
Re: pygment regex question,Re: pygment regex question |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Nov 2022 18:01:29 +0100 |
I agree this would be a better regex, yes.
(You still have that double re: thing in the subject going on, Werner)
L
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022, 17:55 Werner LEMBERG, <wl@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> Note that at the time this regex is active, numbers are taken care
> >> of.
> >
> > Floats are, integers not.
>
> OK, but shouldn't this be rather
>
> ```
> (-?\d+|\\longa|\\breve)\.*
> ```
>
> then?
>
>
> Werner
>
>
- pygment regex question, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/25
- Re: pygment regex question, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/25
- Re: pygment regex question,Re: pygment regex question, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/25
- Re: pygment regex question,Re: pygment regex question,
Luca Fascione <=
- Re: pygment regex question,Re: pygment regex question, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/25
- Re: pygment regex question,Re: pygment regex question, Benkő Pál, 2022/11/25
- Re: pygment regex question,Re: pygment regex question, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/26
Re: pygment regex question, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/25
Re: pygment regex question, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/25