[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Musings on the font-encoding property
|
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
|
Subject: |
Re: Musings on the font-encoding property |
|
Date: |
Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:56:03 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) |
Le mercredi 29 mars 2023 à 13:46 +0000, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> AFAICS, the only limitation is that an
> ordinary text font with a family name 'music' cannot be used.
No :-) unlike what its name suggests, the `font-family` property is a family
symbol, not a font string (yes, it's another misnamed thing in font handling).
The `font-family` values recognized by default are `'roman`, `'sans` and
`'typewriter`. Nothing prevents you from doing (in !1888 syntax)
```
\paper {
fonts.roman = "music"
}
```
The practical impact of the change is mostly a syntax modification that is not
easy to convert-ly (the removal of `\text`, which should be replaced with
`\roman`, `\sans` or `\typewriter` depending on the case).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part