Re: tremolos shorter than a quarter

[Peter Lutek]

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
>  
>
> > is there any plan to support tremolos shorter than a quarter?
> >
> > i.e.  \repeat "tremolo"  2 { c32 e32 }
> >
> > i've had occasion to need them, but they generate a warning and end up 
> > looking like squished-together quarter tremolos with no beam between the 
> > stems. i'll have to hack a beam somehow for now.
> >    
>
> this was just added to 1.9 CVS; thanks for the complaint.
>
>  
>
> > btw - 1.9.8 is excellent. the simplified syntax and new octave 
> > conventions are quite welcome! it took me a while to clean up after 
> > running convert-ly on the large score i'm working on, but it was 
> > definitely worth it. and it's a big relief to be able to split beams 
> > over lines with only one note hanging on either side of the split. YAY!
> >    
>
>
> good!
>
>  
great, but i hope there won't be the same degree of syntax updating 
going to the next version as there was from 1.8.0 to 1.9.8!  i don't 
relish the thought of another long updating session on this score.   :)

-p