[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: efficient score and part production
From: |
David Raleigh Arnold |
Subject: |
Re: efficient score and part production |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:06:17 -0400 |
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 10:46 am, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I don't really see any advantage of using sed or some other
> preprocessor compared to the ordinary features of LilyPond:
It fills in the blanks while you are writing, so you do not have
to write in sequence, you can leave measures blank and still bring it
up. This is very helpful writing polyphony. It removes itself as you
fill each measure in with something.
Combined with a sequence with <> substitution, a related filter
can fill in time values, etc., everything else and all you have to fill
in is the notes, which was the wish of a user who wrote a few months
ago. daveA
--
Br`er Fox told Br`er Rabbit that the Tar Baby had dissed him, and Fox
made a
dummy out of tar and put him in Rabbit's path. When the Tar Baby
failed to
return a civil greeting, Rabbit punched him with a right, a left, both
feet and
butted him with his forehead. Along came Br`er Fox who saw that he was
thoroughly "stuck up". Br`er Fox is much smarter than Br`er Rabbit,
and in
spite of all Rabbit's pleas for help, no one is going to unstick him
and throw
him in the briar patch, so now Br`er Fox is liesurely eating Rabbit's
liver.
D. Raleigh Arnold dra@ http://www.openguitar.com address@hidden
Re: efficient score and part production, David Raleigh Arnold, 2003/10/14
Re: efficient score and part production, Nicolas Sceaux, 2003/10/14