lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: alterations above and below turns, pralls ...


From: Edward Sanford Sutton, III
Subject: Re: alterations above and below turns, pralls ...
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 12:42:19 -0700
User-agent: KMail/1.6.51

On Sunday April 11 2004 12:26, Roland Goretzki wrote:
> Hello list, hello Edward,
>
> You wrote:
> > On Sunday April 11 2004 09:54, Roland Goretzki wrote:
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > >     b
> > >     ~
> > >     #
> > >
> > > Meanwhile I did this cunstruct with text-markups, but this seems to be
> > > very ugly, and I think, it might be possible, to program this as a
> > > feature, isn't it?
> > >
> > > Best Regards           Roland
> >
> > Stacked markups is the way I know, which I need to setup still for a
> > Mutopia piece I am doing. Does it seem ugly as input or output?
>
> Sorry, I'm not shure, if "ugly" was the correct word, but:
>
> The output looks very well, if I did work enough at the fine-tuning. :-)
>
> But if there is a piece with many alterations at articulations, it is a
> lot of work, and this is what I meant with "ugly". :-(
>
> In my opinion the solution with textmarkup in such cases seems to be
> something like a workaround. ;-)

If I can suggest another workaround, create several variables if you are using 
similar ones over and over again.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]