[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: missing term in Icking glossary
From: |
David Raleigh Arnold |
Subject: |
Re: missing term in Icking glossary |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:32:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) |
Graham Percival wrote:
>
> On 14-Jul-05, at 4:15 AM, M. den Teuling wrote:
>
>> Christian Mondrup suggested to me to report a missing term in the
>> gossary : tenuto. I had the term myself forgotten even in Dutch, and
>> so I really missed it. Its opposite staccato is present.
The opposite of staccato is legato.
The reality is that the tenuto mark "-" really doesn't mean anything
very specific, applied to notes that are assumed to be legato anyway,
so it is usually used to point out certain notes, like the entrance
of the subject in a fugue, or it may be the equivalent of an accent
mark. Maybe you could call detache' the opposite of tenuto, but it
isn't really. daveA
- Re: missing term in Icking glossary, libero . mureddu3, 2005/07/29
- Re: missing term in Icking glossary, David Raleigh Arnold, 2005/07/29
- Re: missing term in Icking glossary, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/07/29
- Re: missing term in Icking glossary, joe ferguson, 2005/07/29
- Re: missing term in Icking glossary, Paul Scott, 2005/07/29
- Re: missing term in Icking glossary, David Raleigh Arnold, 2005/07/29
- Re: missing term in Icking glossary, Graham Percival, 2005/07/29