[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New slur/tie behaviour
From: |
Trevor Bača |
Subject: |
Re: New slur/tie behaviour |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:48:02 -0500 |
On 8/31/05, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I just type-set a piece using version 2.7.7 and this piece also
> > had some ties in it. In this example I thought the new behavior was
> > a bit odd as I have two ties in a row but they are longer note
> > values and should they not appear at the same level? I noticed that
> > the change-log gives an example of this new feature but the first
> > note is tied to a very short note followed by a longer one.
>
> I second that. Especially in chords, short ties are moved too much
> vertically from the `correct' place. IMHO, this:
>
> --___-------------___---
> / \ _____ / \
> \___/ / \ \___/
> ------------------------
>
> looks *really* bad. A tie, regardless of being short or long, must
> not be placed completely between two staff lines if the notes are also
> between the same two lines.
>
> For further references I suggest that you take a Henle or UE edition
> of Beethoven's piano sonatas (the later ones).
I agree. Although I have no idea how to verbally state a better rule
... maybe something like "consecutive ties between like pitches should
appear at like vertical positions" ... ?
--
Trevor Bača
address@hidden