lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stupid question regarding absolute pitch designations


From: Sven Axelsson
Subject: Re: Stupid question regarding absolute pitch designations
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:54:56 +0200

On 09/10/05, P B <address@hidden> wrote:
Why is middle C (C3) given the absolute pitch designation

c'?

Would it not make more sense to use just plain old

c

as middle C?

Middle C is usually called C4 if numerical octave indicators are used (the Acoustical Society of America System) It can be called C3 if named by a MIDI octave designator. Anyhow, the correct name for middle C in the alternate Helmholz system used by Lilypond is indeed C'. C without any indicators is one octave below, in the small octave.

So, in short, no, it would not make more sense.

What would it take to alter this in the code, if I wanted to do so for
my own version?

If you insist on using an incorrect notation you can always do
\transpose c c' { c d e f }

--
Sven Axelsson
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]