[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: triangle chord notation
From: |
joelinux |
Subject: |
Re: triangle chord notation |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 08:12:44 -0600 (GMT-06:00) |
I agree with what you are saying about the minor chord with the added major
7th. It's a I minor with added major 7th. as oppsed to the II minor 7th.
To me the CmM7 is clear, but I think it might be better to write Cm #7 or Cm
(#7) if you are going to use the "#"
If the #7 is printed in superscript, it would probably be okay.
-----Original Message-----
>From: "Rick Hansen (aka RickH)" <address@hidden>
>Sent: Aug 8, 2006 1:01 PM
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: Re: triangle chord notation
>
>
>No, the #7 notation is only valid for chords based on the melodic minor
>scale. In the USA we would typically call this for example CmM7 in Europe
>they may call it Cm#7 in both cases the note stack is the same <c ef g b>.
>Speaking it, it's called "the minor major seventh chord", check out the song
>"When You Wish Upon A Star" for an example.
>
>Of course #7 makes no sense at all on major chords, because #7 is the root!
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://www.nabble.com/triangle-chord-notation-tf2042072.html#a5712889
>Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: triangle chord notation, (continued)
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/08
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/08
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/08
Re: triangle chord notation,
joelinux <=
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/09
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/09
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/09
Re: triangle chord notation, joelinux, 2006/08/13