|
From: | fiëé visuëlle |
Subject: | Re: [somewhat-OT] tweaking Lilypond PS/PDF output in (e.g.) Illustrator |
Date: | Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:42:06 +0200 |
Am 2006-08-30 um 01:57 schrieb Trevor Bača:
Also, did you ever go the EPS route when you were importing to Illustrator, or do you always import PDF? (Because it seems like forcibly embedding in an EPS might be a more reliable way of proceding, so I was curious if there's a reason to go the PDF route instead.)
If a program supports PDF sufficiently, then it's the better way! (PDF contains more useful information than EPS.) I wouldn't trust Quark's PDF import, but had nearly never problems with InDesign. (I do such for a living...)
There should be no reason to use any EPS with InDesign! (Even complicated Photoshop pictures with paths, duplex etc. work better as PSD than as EPS!)
Greetlings from Lake Constance --- fiëé visuëlle Henning Hraban Ramm http://www.fiee.net http://angerweit.tikon.ch/lieder/ http://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |