[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beaming strategy
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Beaming strategy |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:41:40 +0100 |
Yes, I am myself a "2-2-2-2-maniac" too. :)
By the way, I wonder if this beaming tradition has once had any
justification. Whatever, Music notation is still (and must keep)
evolving, isnt'it ?
Thank you for opening this discussion.
2006/11/20, Martial <address@hidden>:
> That may be a good reason to do so. Nevertheless I think that the
> alternative way of beaming should be easier to obtain than via a
> number of scheme statements.
> But apparently I stand alone in this.
No, you're not alone!
I use group 2 per 2 for choir score too, to read it's more easy,
especially for the amateurs singers.
So I put in the head of my score file this "macro" qbeam.
--
Martial
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user