lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scheme question on strict substitution


From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: Scheme question on strict substitution
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:47:03 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061107)

Mats Bengtsson escreveu:

>> OK, thank you, that's very clear.  That fact, for any given keyword,
>> would tell a user immediately whether (s)he could just write a macro or
>> would be forced to define a function for some expression involving the
>> keyword.
>>
>> Is the information
>>    (1) number of arguments
>> or preferably
>>    (2) the syntax
>> documented explicitly anywhere for all keywords?
>>   
> As already said, this is not available in the current manual and one
> problem is that
> this would still just tell a small part of the full syntax. Another

This should be rather easy to add to the manual. I believe some of the
functions already have doc strings. It shouldn't be too hard to
extract them in dump them into the program reference. A neat task for
a scheme hacker... Nicolas?

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]