[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond and editors
From: |
Geoff Horton |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond and editors |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:49:42 -0500 |
On 12/7/06, Thomas Scharkowski <address@hidden> wrote:
Just curious:
what's wrong with jEdit?
Thomas
Editors are one of those things that really depend on personal taste.
It may just be that I've been using emacs for too long, but jEdit
drove me nuts. Others have their favorite way of doing things, and
jEdit may or may not work well with that.
So what's wrong with jEdit? Nothing, if it fits the way you work.
Geoff
- Re: lilypond and editors, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/12/01
- Re: lilypond and editors, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/12/01
- Re: lilypond and editors, Andreas v. Heydwolff, 2006/12/07
- Re: lilypond and editors, Andreas v. Heydwolff, 2006/12/07
- Re: lilypond and editors, Frédéric Chiasson, 2006/12/07
- Re: lilypond and editors, Thomas Scharkowski, 2006/12/07
- Re: lilypond and editors,
Geoff Horton <=
- Re: lilypond and editors, Bertalan Fodor, 2006/12/07
- Re: lilypond and editors, Geoff Horton, 2006/12/07
- Re: lilypond and editors, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/12/08
- RE: lilypond and editors, Trevor Daniels, 2006/12/08
- RE: lilypond and editors, Eduardo Vieira, 2006/12/08
- Re: lilypond and editors, Bertalan Fodor, 2006/12/08
- Re: lilypond and editors, Valentin Villenave, 2006/12/08
- Re: lilypond and editors, Anthony W. Youngman, 2006/12/09
- Re: lilypond and editors, Johan Vromans, 2006/12/09
- Re: lilypond and editors, Frédéric Chiasson, 2006/12/07