[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:19:35 +0100 (CET) |
> I think these changes sound scary, it is an additional hack in the
> parser machinery.
Why do you think so? Sometimes syntactic sugar is essential to make
certain situations more comprehensible. Just think of TeX's `=' mark
in things like
\count\foo=1
which can be omitted.
> I think it would be cleaner if \times could be changed to a
> proper music function, e.g. as
> \tuplet 2 3 {...}
> This would remove rules from the parser instead of adding them.
You are thinking too mathematically IMHO.
Werner
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, (continued)
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Eyolf Ostrem, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Paul Scott, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Frédéric Chiasson, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Erik Sandberg, 2006/12/19
- Message not available
- Fwd: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Frédéric Chiasson, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Karl Hammar, 2006/12/20
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Paul Scott, 2006/12/20
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Karl Hammar, 2006/12/21
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Jonathan Henkelman, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Frédéric Chiasson, 2006/12/19
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Graham Percival, 2006/12/20
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Erik Sandberg, 2006/12/21
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Joe Neeman, 2006/12/19
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, David Rogers, 2006/12/19