[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:16:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:58, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > ... hmm, what about allowing
> > \tuplet 3:2 {c8 d e} \tuplet { f e d}
>
> Again, I definitely vote against! We already now have too many
> optional constructs in the syntax, which causes more confusion than
> it helps.
I also vote against this. AFAIK, this kind of repetition seldom happens for
other cases than 2/3 and 4/6; we can easily build music functions for those
cases (i.e., create a unary function \triplet etc.)
--
Erik
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, David Rogers, 2006/12/19
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, stk, 2006/12/20
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/20
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Frédéric Chiasson, 2006/12/20
- RE: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Kress, Stephen, 2006/12/20
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Frédéric Chiasson, 2006/12/20
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Jonathan Henkelman, 2006/12/21
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Mats Bengtsson, 2006/12/21
- Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Jonathan Henkelman, 2006/12/21
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, Trevor Bača, 2006/12/21
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, David Rogers, 2006/12/21
Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question, John Mandereau, 2006/12/21