[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1)
From: |
Paul Harouff |
Subject: |
RE: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1) |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Mar 2007 18:51:54 -0600 |
Okay, I edited Subs.xba and replaced -b eps with -dbackend=eps in all four
places.
Then I deleted the macro in OOo and reinstalled it, so it would load the
changes.
Now, I get the following error:
GNU LilyPond 2.11.20
ERROR: In procedure symbol->string
ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting symbol): #t
The template file has the following:
\include "lilypond-book-preamble.ly"
#(set-global-staff-size 20)
\paper {
#(define dump-extents #t)
ragged-right = ##t
line-width = 7.5\in
}
\layout {
indent = #0
}
{
% ly snippet contents follows:
c' d' e'
% end ly snippet
}
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Percival [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 6:05 PM
To: Paul Harouff
Cc: 'Johan Vromans'; address@hidden
Subject: Re: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1)
Paul Harouff wrote:
> My problem is Lilypond 2.11.20 is not recognizing either
> -b eps or --backend=eps so the code fragment won't compile.
Please see the NEWS for 2.11.
Cheers,
- Graham
- OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1, luis jure, 2007/03/04
- Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1, Johan Vromans, 2007/03/04
- -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), Paul Harouff, 2007/03/04
- Re: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), Graham Percival, 2007/03/04
- RE: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1),
Paul Harouff <=
- Re: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), Mats Bengtsson, 2007/03/05
- Re: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), Paul Harouff, 2007/03/05
- Bug in lilypond-book-preamble (was RE: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1)), Paul Harouff, 2007/03/11
- Not a lilypond-book-preamble.ly bug (was RE: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1)), Paul Harouff, 2007/03/12
Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1, Samuel Hartmann, 2007/03/06
Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1, Johan Vromans, 2007/03/05
Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1, Samuel Hartmann, 2007/03/06