|
From: | Graham Percival |
Subject: | Re: GDP: fourth rearrangement |
Date: | Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:41:22 -0700 |
User-agent: | Icedove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070607) |
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
- You have a much better feeling for the English language than I do, butdo you think that we should keep the current mixture of "staff" and "stave" to denote the same thing, for example in the subsection titles within "Staff notation"?
No; we should use "staff" and "staves". One of the instructions for the Trivial/Easy will be to fix any such mistakes.
I think I wrote "when dealing with multiple @internalsref{Staff}s, you can...", but such phrases should be rephrased to "multiple @{Staff} contexts".
- How about adding some section like "Other typesetting features", which could contain things that don't really fit in anywhere else, like the four I mentioned above.
I've expanded the Education section to include all of these things. I'm not wild about the name "Education", but I think all these items work well inside that section (whatever we name the section).
- Again, I might not have the right intuition for English language, but how about replacing "Text in a score" with something along the lines of "Textual annotations"I would also move "New dynamic marks" from 1.17.2 to 1.17.1.
To match other subsection titles, I called it "Writing text".
- Why doesn't Text markup commands belong under 1.17.2 Text markup?
As Valentin said; the markup commands are even more of a reference. Hmm... actually, what about moving these into an Appendix?
Cheers, - Graham
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |