Re: SOLVED: going backwards in time

[Neil Puttock]

2008/9/6 Adam James Wilson <address@hidden>:
> Hi Han-Wen,
>
> Thanks for the reply.  The example I sent was actually a quite simplified
> version of what I'm attempting to do; there is a real possibility that in my
> actual scores I will cause the 64-bit 'long long' numbers to overflow as
> well.  As you mentioned yourself before, I think the airtight solution is to
> use rationals or arbitrary precision.

Just to let you know, the next development release will have support
for 64-bit rationals.

I imagine arbitrary precision will have to wait for the next
development cycle, since we're approaching the release of 2.12.

Regards,
Neil