[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stemlets and invisible rests
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Stemlets and invisible rests |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:20:57 +0100 |
Hi Joe,
2008/9/17 Joseph Wakeling <address@hidden>:
> It's _almost_ exactly what I want. Note that in the second bar there
> are some hidden/transparent rests. The beams intentionally extend out
> across those rests -- all that is missing are stem(lets) descending from
> those beams.
>
> So -- how can I achieve this? :-) I've searched the archive but only
> came across a 'cheat' that consisted of entering a note with an
> invisible notehead.
\override Staff.Stem #'stemlet-length = #0.75 (tweak length to taste)
> Incidentally, I note that if this is compiled using 2.11.58 instead, the
> beams over the (transparent or not) rests don't display properly...
Regards,
Neil
København Ø.png
Description: PNG image
- Stemlets and invisible rests, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/09/17
- Re: Stemlets and invisible rests,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: Stemlets and invisible rests, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/09/17
- Re: Stemlets and invisible rests, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/09/17
- Re: Stemlets and invisible rests, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/09/17
- Re: Stemlets and invisible rests, Graham Percival, 2008/09/17
- Stemlet snippet, Joseph Wakeling, 2008/09/18
- Re: Stemlet snippet, Neil Puttock, 2008/09/18
- Bad image with one of the snippets, Patrick Horgan, 2008/09/18
- Re: Bad image with one of the snippets, Neil Puttock, 2008/09/18
- Re: Bad image with one of the snippets, Patrick Horgan, 2008/09/18
- Re: Bad image with one of the snippets, Graham Percival, 2008/09/18