|
From: | Trevor Daniels |
Subject: | Re: Moving guitar fingering orientations |
Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 23:14:53 +0100 |
JonI just got around to doing this, but when I look at LM 4.4.2 it already says, immediately above the examples,
"To control the placement of the fingering of a single note using this command it is necessary to write it as a single note chord by placing angle brackets round it."
Seems clear enough to me but, as people seem to miss it, I'll do as you suggest and put it in a warning box.
Trevor----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Kulp" <address@hidden>
To: "Valentin Villenave" <address@hidden> Cc: <address@hidden> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:19 PM Subject: Re: Moving guitar fingering orientations
Aha! I've already sent a revised snippet to Valentin that shows how a single note needs <> for setting the fingering orientations, but as I was punching holes in my newly printed Learning Manual, I noticed an example that already shows this in section 4.4.2 (or on pp. 104-105 of the .pdf version). It has several instances of single notes with fingerings and in each case the note and fingering is enclosed in a chord construct. There's not an explicit @warning about enclosing single notes in <>, but at least you can see it in the example. Could we add a @warning about this above the example?Jon Valentin Villenave wrote:2008/10/12 Jonathan Kulp <address@hidden>:Ah. I see it now. Yes, this is easily fixed. How can I alter thissnippet? Valentin, this is your purview, right? Is it o.k. if I just makethese small changes and email it to you?Yes, please do! Cheers, Valentin-- Jonathan Kulp http://www.jonathankulp.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |