[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: splitting chords entered as <<c e g>>^"with stuff" \etc
From: |
Tim Woodall |
Subject: |
Re: splitting chords entered as <<c e g>>^"with stuff" \etc |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:13:28 +0000 (GMT) |
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I find \relative to work quite nicely for chords, once I understood that
the first note in a chord gets its octave from the first note of the
previous chord. I use \relative mode virtually exclusively for note entry,
regardless of whether it's in single notes or using the chord construct < >.
I do use absolute when I'm in chordmode.
I learned quite a lot writing the script. I had assumed that it was the
interval that was important in deciding whether a note was higher or
lower than the previous note but I now know that it's based on the note
names and ignores accidentals.
So ceses->fisis will go up while cisis->geses will go down. It's obvious
once you've worked it out but I'd been getting away with fifth (7
semitones)=down, fourth(5 semitones)=up which works in almost all cases
in classical music. A six semitone interval is fairly unusual and I had
guessed that there would be a setting to decide which way it want
\augfourdown, \augfourup or something like that.
(That explains some of the apparently odd ways I've done some things in
the script. Initially I was converting notes to numbers 0..11 but that's
no use when you need to distinguish between Gb and F# to calculate
whether a ' or , is required.)
Tim.
--
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
and there was light.
http://www.woodall.me.uk/
Re: splitting chords entered as <<c e g>>^"with stuff" \etc, Gilles THIBAULT, 2009/01/18